Comments. I searched Wikipedia to find information on blood type diets because I read about which you can read here: % 20Diets% Blood group B is, according to D’Adamo, the nomad, associated with a strong immune system and a flexible digestive system. technology have helped rebuild and normalize the bodily systems so they can function (internet search: “Biotype Diets ”). Generally. Characterizing Neurotrophic Systems in the Primate Amygdala That are Relevant to Reward Learning Capacity in Binge Eating Disorder.
|Published (Last):||23 May 2008|
|PDF File Size:||9.91 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||16.28 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Talk:Blood type diet/Archive 1
Wikipedia is a forum for encyclopedic reporting of reality as we as a human species collectively know it, not as a place to grandstand about particular systemm and political positions amongst the various schools of medicine. In fact, difts shows that lectins which are specific for a particular ABO type are not found in foods except for one or two rare exceptions, e. Denying it in the absence of any negative evidence is, therefore, pseudoskepticism.
The interpretation of D’Adamo’s viets of anthropology and blood groups really AE Mourant’s work with blood groups is so far from reality as to call into question the ultimate purpose of this article.
There is conflict of interest, POV issues, etc. Does that answer your questions clearly enough? I helped craft this semi-neutral page and it was a tooth and nail fight to balance the views of diet advocates and skeptics. But no more than the usual intellectual dishonesty associated with your enterprises.
There used to be a much longer article on the blood type diet or diets on Wikipedia, but hiotype was summarily deleted by OrangeMike on the basis of ‘blatant advertising’. The Title is oddly ‘general’ but the arguments against a blood based diet are directed towards a specific source with a tone of malice directed specifically towards an author of a book that was written on the subject in an apparent attempt to discredit him, which if the creator of the pages wants to attempt to possibly read the actual book verse covering the Cliff’s notes about siets, this page could possibly have merit within jnej governing guidelines of wkipedia.
It would be quite unfortunate if Wiki cannot serve as a neutral reference source on such “emerging” disciplines simply because certain skeptics would summarily delete an entire article because they do not agree with it, or because the advocates of such theories would use Wiki as a platform for naked boosterism.
In terms of dietary needs, his blood type diet treats this group as an systme between blood types A and B. Disputing the science systek this theory by citing shortcomings in a book obviously written for the mass market, while ignoring or excluding a much more intellectually intense primary body of work dietts illustrates the superficiality of the whole Wikipedia enterprise, and prompts me to dispute the neutrality of this article.
They are mostly opinions, not based on in-depth research. There are better ways to phrase it. I, also, would like to note that I’ve read through the Yatamato study that is cited multiple times as evidence against D’Adamo’s claims and not only does it not seem to provide evidence against, but I can’t find the quotation utilized anywhere in the study.
The blood type diet is not only a eating but also an exercise regime, which encourages the diets of our ancestors, configuring to their blood type and advises adhesion to their habits for optimum health.
This is a fraudulent use of citations.
Folks, it’s all about money. This article has glaring NPOV issues and should never have languished so long. So, here we see that even with only 1 study, we can start to make the inferences about blood type based nutrition that D’Adamo has made after reading thousands and performing his own independent tests.
The blood type diet claims that people of jbem type B are the only ones who can thrive on dairy products and estimates blood type B arrived 10, years ago. Agriculture did not develop 20, years ago.
In the opening of the article, the citations referencing “consensus in the scientific community” do nothing of the sort. It can not be proven that there is a ‘consensus’, it can only be proven that many scientists and dieticians are critical of this theory.
Where is this quotation from? This means such studies should sytem then noted in the article.
There is considerable supporting data. At most they qualify as professional debating points on the subject, not “proof”.
Talk:Blood type diet/Archive 1 – Wikipedia
And of course you simply must buy his book. However, I’m not prepared to spend time and energy trying to reverse this decision as I doubt it will be easy. Since you’ve accused me of “intellectual dishonesty” whatever that iswhy not take your words on to the floor and show us what you have.
Alteripse, I’d like to be worthy of your trouble. The opening paragraph claims that didts consensus” among scientists and dieticians is Also claiming that there is “consensus” among literally thousands of various health professionals that the blood type diet ‘has no scientific basis’ is a near impossibility; its a very poor, black-and white absolutiststatement logically and statistically sysetm impossible and makes the article opening lose credibility and look like an opinion piece.
There is a clear, coherent scientific foundation for the blood type diet hypothesis. If you are could you please admit that or state that you work with him before editing the page.
Type O is universal, whereas type A is predominant from the fertile cresent radiating outward in decreasing amounts.