William Klaas Frankena (June 21, – October 22, ) was an American moral . Introductory Readings in Ethics, W.K. Frankena and J.T. Granrose, eds., . Ethics has 88 ratings and 8 reviews. M. Azhaari Shah said: Tertarik dengan ulasan salah seorang pembaca, don’t read this book unless you have to. Ap. Get this from a library! Ethics. [William K Frankena] — Normative theories of obligation, moral and nonmoral value, and meta-ethical issues and.
|Published (Last):||2 January 2004|
|PDF File Size:||17.7 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.97 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Ethics (Foundations of Philosophy)
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Refresh and try again. Open Preview See a Problem?
W. K. Frankena and Ethics of Virtue | The Monist | Oxford Academic
Thanks for telling us about the problem. Return to Book Page. Preview — Ethics by William K. Ethics Foundations of Philosophy by William K. An introduction to the standard material of ethics. Paperback2ndpages.
Published November 11th by Pearson first published To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. To ask other readers questions about Ethicsplease sign up. Lists with This Book. This book is not yet featured on Listopia. May 16, M. Azhaari Shah Sulaiman rated it it was ok Shelves: Tertarik dengan ulasan salah seorang pembaca, ” don’t read this book unless you have to”.
Apa itu Intrinsic value? Atas premis apa etika dan morality harus dipandang? Secara kesimpulannya, buku ini memuaskan. Pembahasan soal etika dan morality menurut pandangan falsafah dikupas dengan begitu panjang lebar.
Termasuk pandangan tokoh dari aliran utilitarianisme, deontologis. Jul 19, Rob rated it liked it. Frankena is quite fair in this introduction to normative ethics and meta-ethics. He encourages his readers to listen to his arguments but also to reason out the subject matter for themselves; he tries to avoid dogmatism.
For the most part, he clearly defines his terms and occasionally repeats the drankena of previous chapters, thus making the book tie together well. This book has challenged me about the connection between metaphysics and ethics in that Frankena seems to argue that ethics is not r Frankena is quite fair in this introduction to frankenna ethics and meta-ethics.
This book has challenged me ethicd the connection between metaphysics and ethics in that Frankena seems to argue that ethics is not rooted in the nature of things although Frankena does discuss the question of whether humans are free or determined, a metaphysical concern.
I, however, tend to lean toward the notion that God as Franksna has given humans their nature and determines what is good and evil for us.
William Frankena – Wikipedia
Specifically, as humans are made in the image of God, it is good for us to be like God e. It seems that many moral laws can be derived by considering human nature and society and what preserves human life. For example, we ought to feed the hungry because humans as made in the image of God have intrinsic value for they are lesser goods made in the image of the supreme good ; but because we as humans can reason, act freely, and know our own nature, we have extra moral responsibility.
Thus, in some cases the death penalty for murder may be appropriate, especially if the murderer has no remorse.
Ethics, 2nd Edition
On another note, is it humane to institutionalize someone? Some after extended solitary confinement can no longer stand society and thus turn to crime or suicide to take themselves back out of society. Even so, I have much to learn about the study of normative franlena and meta-ethics. But I still prefer metaphysics. Jun 09, Alex rated it it was ok Shelves: I read portions of it for a course I took on Ethics. It helped to provide introductory framework and arguments for further study. At the time, Ehics did not know who William Frankena was.
This peaked my interests in the views that Frankena might hold. I don’t know, maybe I will return to this book one day.
Sep 29, Sadra Hashemi rated it it was amazing. Jan 21, AJ rated it it was ok Shelves: Not bad, but not really great either. Fair to midland I guess. Much of Frankena’s language is difficult to follow, but his points are good.
I would say don’t read it unless you have to Dec 15, John rated it did not like it. Sep 23, Lisa rated it really liked it. Jan 15, Steve rated it did not like it. Don’t read this book if you want to learn about ethics. It’s dry, very dense, and our professor basically wrote the book into an easier outline format, so I did’t read beyond the first two chapters.
Pratik Gautam rated it really liked it Dec 08, Kasia rated it it was amazing May 17, Charles rated it liked it Jul 27, Dave rated it liked it Jul 21, Zahratorabi rated it it was amazing Apr 16, Siddhesh Ambhire rated it really liked it Dec 03, Gordon Schultz rated it it was amazing Mar 12, Rachel Hecht rated it liked it Jan 03, Sarmila rated it it was amazing Nov 30, Zach rated it liked it May 26, Sharabenab rated it really liked it Jul 30, Elmo rated it it was ok Mar 12, Jon Frey rated it it was amazing Jun 05, Gwanghyeon Kim rated it liked it Dec 12, Katie rated it liked it Sep 01, Reza rated it really liked it Dec 03, Gerald Creel rated it it was ok Nov 11, Kavita Sharma rated it it was ok May 26, Art Mitchell rated it it was ok Jul 26, Seth rated it liked it Oct 21, Koushik Nagaraj rated it liked it Mar 14, There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
Books by William K. No trivia or quizzes yet. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.