ISO Quality Assurance Requirements for Measuring Equipment – Part 1 : Metrological Confirmation System for Measuring Equipment. ISO/IEC General requirements for the competence of testing A: The two standards in question, ISO and ISO have. ISO INTERNATIONAL. STANDARD. ISO. First edition .. and replaces ISO and ISO , of which it.
|Published (Last):||19 July 2007|
|PDF File Size:||3.93 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.52 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Difference Between ISO/IEC and ISO –
Pricey, however that is the direction calibrations are going in the future. ISO defines requirements for entire quality management system that can be accredited. The competence referred to in the oso of the standard relates to the competence of the entire system — not just training of personnel. Managing the Measurement SystemQuality Progress.
It also depends on the focus of your business. Metrology ProgramQuality Progress. From the scope of ISO Correctly applied measurement, wherever and however it occurs, is ios essential element of a successful business QMS.
Managing the Measurement SystemQuality Progress Discussion related to the importance and timing of equipment calibration. Even if 100012-1 organization chooses to adhere to the requirements of ISOthe certification to ISO does not imply certification to the requirements of ISO General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratoriesand I would like oso on usage and application of these standards.
There is a great deal of richness in the ISO family of documents and it is a shame for users to not know about and take advantage of the full range of possibilities. If you want to generate true confidence of measurement that your customers and AB appreciate, then of all of those standards, I recommend Z An organization, for example, could have a quality management systems that is certified to ISO It addresses such factors as contracts with customers, purchasing, internal auditing, and management review of the entire quality management system — ISO does not.
While the scope of both documents includes language that can perhaps cause confusion, what follows is the salient text from both that illuminates the difference between the two. Skip to content Q: If calibrations are just a subsidiary aspect of your business, then spending the money to get accredited may not be necessary, especially if its for internal use only. It defines requirements relevant to the measurement management system in language that may illustrate interrelations to other parts of an overall quality management system.
Discussion related to the importance and timing of equipment calibration. I am updating the instrumentation section of a product fabrication specification to replace a cancelled military specification MIL-STD that specified calibration systems requirements. You can consider it a system within the quality management system.
ISO describes the requirements for a quality management system that can be accredited a process comparable but different from certification. Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. In summary, ISO isk a guidance document that addresses one element namely management of a measurement system of a quality management system. ISO is a guidance document and not intended for certification.
ISO – Wikipedia
Root Cause Analysis Samples. It encompasses all aspects of the laboratory.
ISO focuses isl the requirements of the measurement management system. Denise Robitaille Vice Chair, U. However if you are performing calibrations for other companies, and you are not accredited yet, I strongly recommend Z